In the meantime, every federal state thinks differently, at least when it comes to store openings.

In the meantime, every federal state thinks differently, at least when it comes to store openings.

That also makes tests difficult. Source: “Baerbock spoke from the Berlin Tempodrom to their party members gathered on the Internet. The photo shows the rehearsal for the speech. (Photo: picture alliance / dpa) The Greens are giving themselves a new basic program, the At the start of the federal party conference, the co-chairman Baerbock is preparing her party for the upcoming tasks: first and foremost the compliance with the Paris climate targets. At the start of the three-day federal party conference of the Greens, the co-chairwoman Annalena Baerbock has her Party attuned to the upcoming challenges for their party and politics in general in a haunting speech, with Baerbock drawing the broad lines from the focus on the fight against climate change to the necessary restructuring of the economic system and the need to bring more children into the To put politics at the center and to make Europe more independent and stronger At this year’s federal delegates’ conference, which was moved from the planned venue in Karlsruhe to the Internet due to the pandemic situation, the Greens want to adopt a new basic program. This is intended to lay the foundation for the program for the 2021 federal election, in which the Greens are striving to take over government. Baerbock justified the Greens’ claim to leadership with the urgency of climate protection: “” 2040 or 2050 is not critical.

The 20s are critical – the next ten years, “said Baerbock. “” Now the decisive decade begins. We have to get down to business now. “” Within 30 years it must be possible to achieve climate neutrality in order to preserve life and prosperity. The aim is to “” heat the earth to well below 2 degrees and as much as possible Direction to limit 1.5 degrees “”. That is the target corridor mentioned in the Paris climate protection agreement.

Immediately before the meeting of the Greens, Fridays for Future activist Luisa Neubauer, in an interview with the editorial network Germany, demanded that the Greens aim for a maximum global warming of 1.5 degrees. An amendment to the basic program also demands that. Baerbock said: “” The political task is to translate the factual necessity of 1.5 degrees into parliamentary majorities. “” The member of the Bundestag accused the governing parties from the Union and SPD of climate policy always to pinch when it comes to concrete solutions. “” It’s not about a little less CO2, but the decisive factor is: zero emissions, climate neutrality. “” Baerbock promoted the green concept of an ecological-social market economy: There is no reason to be afraid of the ideas of the Greens. “” This climate revolution is about as crazy as a home loan and savings contract, “” she said. “Reorganizing the economic system does not mean overturning, it is pure self-protection.” “It must be worth doing the right thing and not doing the wrong thing,” she said of green ideas for regulation and new rated biology essay writing service The market economy must be further developed. This includes a “” new social security promise and, above all, participation “”. Baerbock called for schools to be modernized, better equipped and, above all, to promote digitization in education. In addition, children should be more in the focus of politics.

This also applies to the Corona measures: children suffered from not going to school for weeks and not seeing their friends. In addition, domestic violence against children increased in the Corona crisis. “” Child protection is systemically relevant. Daycare centers and schools are vital, “said the 39-year-old mother of two young daughters. Baerbock, who, together with her co-chairman Robert Habeck, is one of two possible Green top candidates for the federal elections, also spoke about international politics . She recalled the Belarusian opposition’s struggle for democratic change: “” 25,000 arrests: beaten, raped, tortured, some died for their right to democracy and freedom. “” The Belarusian opposition leader Svetlana Tichanovskaya is due to give a greeting to the party during the party congress Delegates speak. Baerbock, who is running in Potsdam in the same constituency as SPD chancellor candidate Olaf Scholz, also called for a strong Europe that would become more independent of the USA in economic and security policy and that would not wear itself out in the systemic competition between the USA and China. “Our foreign policy strength also depends on our strength on the global financial markets,” said Baerbock, who campaigned for a euro as the reserve currency. Baerbock said of Beijing: “” We will not be able to isolate China, it is too big and important for that.

But we must not surrender ourselves or other states to these authoritarian regimes. “” With the new basic program, the chairwoman concluded her speech, the Greens could “” open a new chapter for our country, for our common Europe “” Baerbock’s speech is not about who will accept the Greens’ candidacy for chancellor. Habeck will have his performance tomorrow, Saturday. He had spoken to Baerbock at the previous federal delegates’ conference. The two want to decide together in the spring who will be candidate for chancellor. Source: “News and information at a glance. Collection of articles from on the subject of the party congress Notwithstanding the corona pandemic, the AfD wants and is allowed to have 600 delegates as well at the end of November other participants gather for the federal party conference in Kalkar.

However, the party defends itself against the requirements of the Corona Protection Ordinance and takes a mask requirement to court. The Greens start the first multi-day digital party congress on Friday. “” This is an absolute novelty, “says managing director Michael Kellner in an interview. The new basic program to be adopted is for him a milestone on the way of the Greens to the Chancellery.

In the middle of the pandemic, the North Rhine-Westphalian state government approved a presence party conference of the AfD. Given the current lockdown rules, this decision is absurd. A comment by Christian Berger The AfD is planning its federal party conference in North Rhine-Westphalia with 600 delegates – but even in the open air only meetings with a maximum of 500 participants are allowed. The chairman Meuthen announced that he would sue in case of doubt.

The top of the AfD wants to put the model of a basic income up for discussion at the party congress. Accordingly, all citizens should be paid 500 euros per month. But the economically liberal wing of the party also receives a concession.

Was it Merz’s wedging or the public admonition from party leader Kramp-Karrenbauer? The three applicants for the CDU chairmanship have now agreed that the new party leadership will be elected in January – regardless of whether at a face-to-face party conference or digitally. Trenches have opened up in the CDU since the party congress was canceled. Party leader Kramp-Karrenbauer is resisting this. She publicly urges the candidates to exercise restraint.

If it goes on like this, everyone could be left out and someone else triumphant. The party conference in December – canceled. The decision on the CDU chairmanship – postponed. However, the party is under increasing pressure to make a quick decision.

Union parliamentary group leader Brinkhaus demands this “” as soon as possible “”. Even the SPD is getting impatient. After the postponement of the CDU party congress with the election of the new chairman, candidate Merz collapsed: The process was part of an “” action ‘prevent Merz’ “”. In order to stop this, the Sauerland is said to have blatantly threatened with stink in a confidential top round. In the Berlin SPD, Federal Family Minister Giffey was to be elected to the top at the weekend.

But the delegates’ meeting shares the fate of several planned party conferences in these weeks: failure due to Corona. “A furniture store in Pulheim, North Rhine-Westphalia, advises customers of the distance requirement Confusion. Different requirements for shops and masks apply in every federal state. The political competition between the prime ministers is damaging the overarching goal of the entire population being involved in the fight against Corona. Prime Minister Armin Laschet has just put a new stamp on his state in passing.

North Rhine-Westphalia is the “” state of kitchen builders “,” said the applicant for the CDU chairmanship in a telephone switch with the CDU presidium. Party colleague and Prime Minister Reiner Haseloff will have taken good note of the choice of words. Maybe Saxony-Anhalt will finally get rid of the unofficial title of the pieiest federal state that it had once acquired with the image campaign “Land of early risers.” With the wording, Laschet wanted to justify the opening of furniture stores in North Rhine-Westphalia.

The dispute over this is exemplary of the political chaos in the second phase that has now begun to contain the corona pandemic. The federal government and the federal states are pulling in the same direction – but with unequal strength and certainly not at the same time. Federalism cannot shine at this point in the crisis. That comes unexpectedly, as everyone involved had extensive opportunities to prepare for a coordinated approach. Last week, a loosening was agreed jointly, in which Bavaria was not involved.

In the meantime, every federal state thinks differently, at least when it comes to store openings. The regulations are also different when it comes to face masks. Chancellor Angela Merkel, who obviously worried about “opening discussion orgies”, can be happy that at least the curfews are still handled in the same way. Of course, there are good arguments for the fact that 16 federal states autonomously implement guidelines in consultation with the federal government. Federalism relies on a competition for ideas. This is just as proven as the principle that the federal states and municipalities always know and assess their own situation best.

Especially in the current pandemic, which affects the countries very unevenly, a locally different approach can make sense. But the competition for a solution that is most appropriate to tackling the problem has long since fallen under the wheels of political contest. Considerations about the spread of corona infections are only one of several factors. The effort to score points with voters is obviously of equal weight in the strategy debates in the state chancelleries of the federal states. There is no other way of explaining the new confusion of rules in the country.

With Saxony and Mecklenburg-Western Pomerania, federal states are first introducing a mask requirement that do not have a lot of corona cases. The fact that, according to the federal government, there are not enough masks for a nationwide mask requirement does not seem to have played a role in the resolution in Schwerin and Dresden. NRW, on the other hand, which is home to a corona focus with the district of Heinsberg, wants to be a pioneer of a more relaxed approach – the many kitchen manufacturers who have always formed the backbone of the Rhine-Ruhr region. Irony off.

Politicians are feeling the pressure of the ailing economy and only very few countries can put together such fat rescue packages for their economy as rich Bavaria. Prime Minister Markus Söder can simply afford to wrinkle his nose at other heads of government when their knees go weak for fear of company bankruptcies. The same game with the question of retail space: The 800 square meter limit that applies to most countries comes from case law which classifies larger stores as large. Why can’t all countries agree on regulations that are based on infection protection? Then it would be all about the implementation of hygiene measures and distance regulations in the shops, instead everyone interprets the rules as they see fit. Brandenburg even wants to open shopping centers.

Potsdam is putting Berlin under pressure to do the same so that people don’t go shopping in the bacon belt and return with Sars-CoV-2. If necessary, the virus is also available in the local mall, but at least the money stays in your own state. The thoughts and fears are understandable, nobody likes to swap with the politically responsible in such a severe crisis. However, the federal and state governments have gained a lot of trust with the courageous curfews of the past few weeks, because they were well founded in terms of content and the measures in the end worked Federal Republic declared plausible for almost everyone.

If that unity wanes, it is only a matter of time before people’s trust will wane. But the governments are urgently dependent on this in the months of the crisis situation. Source: “There was a passionate argument in the Bundestag on Friday. (Photo: picture alliance / dpa) Today’s debate on electoral law reform marks perhaps the last chance to inflate further of the Bundestag. But that failed because of the governing parties. The Union and the SPD are undermining the reputation of the parliament and fueling the opponents of democracy. The German electoral law is so complicated that even new graduates of political science cannot explain straight away, how election results are converted into Bundestag mandates.

So far, this has been very lucky for the grand coalition. If the matter were more understandable, the issue of electoral reform would have been thrown around her ears earlier. By this Friday at the latest, however, it became clear to what extent the representatives of the people from the ranks of the (former) people’s parties failed in two central questions: to preserve the reputation of democracy and to ensure the functioning of its most important institution – the Bundestag – which has been for many years the Bundestag is concerned with the question of how the tried and tested German electoral system of first and second votes can be maintained even with a large number of parties represented in the Bundestag. More and more parties entered parliament through the second vote. Most direct mandates, i.e. members elected with the first vote in the constituency, continue to go to the CDU, CSU and SPD.

This had led to numerous overhang seats, i.e. more directly elected members of these parties than they were actually entitled to after the second vote result. In 2013, as a result of a Federal Constitutional Court ruling, the members of parliament agreed to compensate for excess seats with additional seats in order to maintain party proportionality.